A streetcar named desire Essay Example for Free

A streetcar named desire Essay The story of A Streetcar Named Desire focuses around the life of a woman used to having lots of money, maids and slaves. The story is about her moving to the poorer, friendly, less sophisticated, multiracial city of New Orleans to live with her worse off sister and brother in law in their small, messy apartment. Blanche, the woman, used to be a wealthy landowner but gradually lost it all as time went on. She was sacked from her teaching job because she was on the early stages of a nervous breakdown and lost her home, Belle Reve, which is why she temporarily moved in with her sister. Stella is Blanches sister. She used to live with Blanche when she was younger but has moved to New Orleans and become used to life there with her husband and friends. She lives in a small apartment block called Elysian Fields. She is pregnant when Blanche moves in. Stanley is Stellas husband. His family are polish but he says he is 100% American. He is quite rough and violent but he loves his wife. He also loves bowling and gambling but he dislikes Blanche simply because she owns more expensive property than Stella does. Stanley sizes up a womans personality just by looking at her. His first impressions of Blanche are not too bad but as the play progresses and he learns more about her past his impressions get worse. Blanche and Stanley want to destroy each other from the start. Their personalities clash too much for them to get along. Blanche describes Stanley to Stella: He acts like an animal, has an animals habits! Eats like one, moves like one, talks like one! Theres even something sub-human something not quite to the stage of humanity yet! Blanche is a very delicate, wealthy looking woman. She is quite good looking but tries to avoid light as it brings out every wrinkle in her face and shows off her real age. She pretends to be young, although she is about five years older than Stella. She tells lies to people who dont know her because that is how she thinks things should be. Stella and Stanley came to be together with Blanche because Blanche was sacked from her teaching job for having an affair with a seventeen year old student and lost her plantation, Belle Reve, due to lack of money. She went to stay with Stella and Stanley because she needed somewhere to live where she can have someone to look after her. At first, Blanche acts quite nervously around Stanley although before long she starts to flirt with him. Stanley doesnt like Blanche too much at first but is friendly towards her because Stella tells him to be. However, after a while Stanley gets angry with Blanche because of her expensive property and long baths in the mornings. He is often shouting at her and even goes as far as raping her nearer the end of the play. Blanche is disgusted with Stanleys behaviour and starts to think of him as an animal. Stanley finds out that Blanche has lost Belle Reve. He also notices Blanches collection of fine clothing and jewellery of which he exclaims: Open your eyes to this stuff! You think she got them out of teachers pay? This makes me think that Stanley believes that Blanche got the money for her clothes and jewellery from Belle Reve. It is at this point when Stanley takes control of the relationship between the three and brings up the Napoleonic Code: In the state of Louisiana we have the Napoleonic Code according to which what belongs to the wife belongs to the husband and vice versa. Stanley becomes angry when he doesnt receive any money from the loss of Belle Reve. Stanley uses Stella as an attempt to get Blanche to leave. Stanley knows that if he cant persuade Blanche to leave then Stella can. He is constantly trying to find th dope on Blanche. Simultaneously, Blanche tries to convince Stella to leave Stanley: Dont dont hang back with the brutes (referring to Stanley)! Also, Stanley refrains from Stellas wishes and decides to give Blanche a hint. For her birthday he gives her a one way ticket back to Laurel, the city in which Belle Reve was based, showing heartlessness and selfishness. This destroys Blanche. Throughout the play, Blanche taunts Stanley as a Polack: You healthy Polack, without a nerve in your body, of course you dont know what anxiety feels like! To which Stanley replies angrily: I am not a Polack. People from Poland are Poles, not Polacks. But what I am is a one hundred per cent American, born and raised in the greatest country on earth and proud as hell of it, so dont ever call me a Polack. Stanley complains about Blanches constant bathing. He mimics her; washing out some things, soaking in a hot tub. Stanleys friend, Mitch becomes a victim of the relationship when he falls for Blanche. Blanche lies to him about her age and background. Just as Blanche believes that she shall get married to Mitch, Stanley destroys the relationship by revealing the truth behind the lies which were told to Mitch. Stanley defends Mitch from Blanche and although the relationship between the two had finished, Mitch still became angry at Stanley and went as far as threatening to kill him when Stanley had her taken away by a doctor and his matron. Whilst Stella is giving birth to her child Stanley goes back to Elysian Fields drunk. When he gets back to the apartment he meets Blanche, wondering, dreamily about the rich life. In his drunken state he tries to seduce Blanche but when she is having none of it he rapes her. This is a major point in the story because it symbolises the strength of Stanley, the fragility of Blanche and how much more power he has over her. Stanley had gradually destroyed Blanche from the moment he found out about Belle Reve and, at the end of the story, he managed to get her to leave by using her own weaknesses against her. Therefore, Stanley triumphed over Blanche.

Theories of Personality Essays -- Psychology, Personality Test

Introversion has the greatest chance of negatively affecting SLA. Students that are afraid of embarrassing themselves by speaking incorrectly or by not being able to speak at all may try to avoid opportunities that would otherwise aid their learning (Zhang, 2008). Since 1960, personality has emerged as major field of specialization among doctoral candidates (Vance & Macphail, 1964). Many investigations have been accomplished followed by literature on a variety of theories of personality. The importance on individual differences and distinctiveness of the individual are the most frequent features of the study of personality. There is a guarantee that each person’s profile is different from that of another person and thus, each person has unique personality (Allport & Odbert, 1936). Nevertheless, the question is how do we determine personality? In general, the easiest approach to do this was through the observations of individual differences. Though, the validity and reliability of such observation can be questioned as it is not efficient and systematic adequately. On the other han...

The book by William Zinsser On Willing Well

The book by William Zinsser On Willing Well is a profound guide for writers in any nonfiction genre: from science to travel, sports to management. The author, William Zinsser, was a writer and editor for the New York Herald Tribune and developed this book out of a nonfiction writing course he taught at Yale.Zinsser writes with refreshing simplicity, humor, and encouraging frankness. He's not one of these writers who pretends that the words just flow; he readily admits to delay, paralysis, and even perspiring over challenging projects. â€Å"Writing is hard work†¦Remember this in moments of despair. If you find that writing is hard, it's because it is hard.†This guide includes the entire process of writing. Chapters address a spectrum of central issues: principles, methods, forms, and attitudes. Throughout the first chapter, reader can see that all of us write differently; we have different styles, we write to different audiences, and we have our own sense of humor.â€Å" On Writing Well† offers a very large scope of techniques and styles centered around enhancing writing, and helping to convey the simplest, most effective message possible.After the first chapter, a reader will remember that simplicity is always the best option when writing. Today, our society is too perplexed in making our words clear. So perplexed, that we often confuse each other. Keeping a straightforward message is not only important, it is realistic. One should think of the process as cutting and burning a forest. Just as time is involved in allowing that forest to re-grow, we must take time to rebuild our sentences.The next chapter deals with the reinforcement of what we just learned. To make our writing as strong as possible, we have to get rid of everything that isn't needed. Many sentences are too overloaded with adjectives. It is interesting, but true, that the political field has frequently used evasive wording and overloaded sentences to try and cover up the meanin g of the truth.The ideas must be quick and to the point, so that to be easier to understand. Decorating sentences with extra words won't earn any respect, in fact, they may do just the opposite.The book also discusses the importance of developing your own style. Zinsser says that although it sounds paradoxical, before we can develop an unmistakable style, we have to cut down our writing to the bare minimum. A very convincing passage was:â€Å"Few people realize how badly they write. Nobody has shown them how much excess or murkiness has crept into their style and how it obstructs what they are trying to say.†Psychology also makes a somewhat unexpected appearance in the text. â€Å"Writing is an act of ego, and you might as well admit it. Use its energy to keep yourself going.† To be able to write well, one must be comfortable with yourself. When we are relaxed, we write better, and the reader notices it.The sections on principles and methods include the usual suspects-conceiving a compelling opening paragraph, focusing on the audience, achieving unity of voice, choosing words carefully, ending with a punch, and (everyone's favorite) revising.His chapters on forms offer guidelines for writing in specific fields-business, science, sports, humor, the arts. The final chapters on attitude discuss psychological aspects of writing: embracing the sound of your authentic voice; enjoyment, fear, and confidence; how an infatuation with the idea of a finished product can impede your progress; a writer's decisions; and finally, an exhortation to write the highest quality work you can.The chapter on a writer's decisions offers a glimpse into Zinsser's critical thought process for his own writing: he parcels out paragraphs of an article he wrote for a travel magazine, an notated with detailed commentary about the editorial choices he made as he wrote.Author takes on an historical perspective of nonfiction as literature, if only to serve as an inspiration to developing nonfiction writers. He marks the change in society from radio to television, and discusses that with the developing need for accurate information. The style he uses is direct and simple, free of confusion, the product of self-restraint. Varied with the author's insights and anecdotes are plentiful samples of writing both strong and weak, varying in style and genre, to illustrate the principles discussed in a given section. In addition to numerous excerpts of his own work, he shares selections from highly regarded writers like Joan Didion, E.B. White, Joseph Mitchell, John Updike, and Cynthia Ozick.My one reclamation with the book is this: I do not agree with Zinsser's advice on dealing with gendered pronouns (he favors masculine pronouns when there is no graceful way to avoid choosing a gender-somehow using an occasional â€Å"she† fails to occur to him) and he sporadically refers to collective humanity as â€Å"man.† However, beyond that, I find his advice flawless and his writing an excellent model of the principles he sticks to.On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfictionby William Zinsser (New York , NY- HarperPerennial, 1998),6th Edition, 308 pages

Moral Philosophy Is An Area Shrouded By Debate Essay

The prevalence given to pleasure in moral philosophy is an area shrouded by debate. Fundamentally the argument becomes one of utilitarianism opposed by deontological ethics. Other theories such as egoism and virtue ethics provide examples of how one should live a moral life which, depending on the defined notion of pleasure, could have the value prescribed to their theoretical guides for how to lead the moral life. Often when we consider what is pleasurable our thoughts delve towards the emotions such as happiness and euphoria. Pleasure is defined as, â€Å"a feeling of happiness, enjoyment, or satisfaction† (Merriam-Webster, 2016). This definition entails the argument surrounding the importance of pleasure in moral philosophy becomes more encompassing. The inclusion of satisfaction suggests that a significant number of philosophical theories can now be considered as part of this debate. As a result of this, this essay will argue that pleasure could in fact be the most signifi cant attribute we must assign to the moral sphere of which all-beings live within, as it is an established quality in a significant number of highly regarded theories that the philosophical community accept as some of the most influential work on moral philosophy. Firstly, as the deontological approach significantly differs from the view I shall be arguing for, to esteem it the respect it so rightly deserves it seems only just to acknowledge it as a valid theory of how one should ethically live. TheShow MoreRelatedOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pageschallenging subject. This is not the case with the present book. This is a book that deserves to achieve a wide readership. Professor Stephen Ackroyd, Lancaster University, UK This new textbook usefully situates organization theory within the scholarly debates on modernism and postmodernism, and provides an advanced introduction to the heterogeneous study of organizations, including chapters on phenomenology, critical theory and psychoanalysis. Like all good textbooks, the book is accessible, well researchedRead MoreRonald Reagan s Rise Of Power5415 Words   |  22 Pagesin the face of adversity. He was the ardent Republican who fought for the rights of the citizens and believed i n the future. This persona however, just like California, was much more complex. Reagan was and still is somewhat of a mystery. He is shrouded in tales of heroism; some exaggerated, some never confirmed. One of the better known stories involves a young woman by the name of Melba Lohmann. Ms. Lohmann had just exited a bus and was walking down the street. Suddenly, a man sticks the barrelRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagescompare in imaginative ways the similarities and differences among diverse flows in different geographical areas and across ethnic communities and social strata. They consider not only the nature, volume, and direction of migrant movements motivated primarily by opportunities for economic advancement—including the massive movement of rural agriculturalists to rapidly growing urban areas—but also the often-neglected displacements of populations that resulted from the wars, revolutions, and naturalRead MoreHbr When Your Core Business Is Dying74686 Words   |  299 Pagesï ¬ lings that are incorporated by reference into the offering documents. Second, outside directors should seek independent advice on the terms of their company’s DO policy. Directors’ interests don’t always coincide with those of management in this area. For example, outside directors will want a policy with a â€Å"severability† provision: one that covers them in the event that an ofï ¬ cer of the company has engaged in misconduct that would otherwise allow the insurer to deny coverage to all directors andRead MoreRastafarian79520 Words   |  319 PagesLumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Sà £o Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Copyright  © 2003 by Ennis Barrington Edmonds The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior